Find the Most Accurate Historical Weather Data
By John Bryant, Updated February 7th, 2026
If you’re representing a client in a property damage claim, personal injury case, or insurance dispute where wind conditions are at issue, the quality and defensibility of your weather data can make or break your case. Whether you’re investigating a fallen tree injury, roof damage claim, construction accident, or maritime incident, obtaining authoritative historical wind records is critical to establishing causation and liability.
This guide provides attorneys, paralegals, and legal researchers with a roadmap to locate, evaluate, and obtain historical wind data that will hold up under scrutiny in litigation and insurance proceedings.
FORENSIC WEATHER SERVICES HELP
Understanding Data Source Defensibility
Not all weather data sources are created equal from a legal standpoint. When selecting a data source, consider its defensibility rating:
Defensibility Ratings Explained
High Defensibility – Authoritative government archives with documented quality control, station metadata, and the ability to obtain certified copies. These sources provide direct instrumental evidence and are widely accepted in legal proceedings.
Medium Defensibility – Research-grade datasets or model-assimilated reanalysis products. While scientifically rigorous and offering excellent coverage, these may lack direct instrumental provenance at your specific location.
Low Defensibility – Crowdsourced or uncalibrated data. Best used as supporting context rather than primary evidence in litigation.
For most legal applications, you’ll want to prioritize high-defensibility sources.
Primary Sources for Legally Defensible Wind Data
1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
NCEI Climate Data Online (CDO) is your first stop for official U.S. weather records.
Coverage:Global and comprehensive U.S. archive access
Access:Web interface with certified copy ordering
Cost:Free for standard data; certified products may incur fees
Legal Defensibility:HIGH
Why it matters for lawyers:
CDO provides access to certified weather records that are routinely accepted in court. You can obtain official certification for specific dates and locations, which carries substantial evidentiary weight.
How to use it:
Visit the Climate Data Online portal, search by location (city, zip code, or coordinates), select your date range, and choose relevant parameters including wind speed and direction.
2. Integrated Surface Database (ISD / Global Hourly)
Best for: Hourly wind observations with quality assurance flags
Coverage:Global land stations (1901–present)
Resolution:Hourly station observations
Access:Download portal
Cost:Free
Legal Defensibility:HIGH (station quality varies)
Why it matters for lawyers:
When you need to establish specific hourly wind conditions—for example, demonstrating that winds exceeded a certain threshold at the time of an incident—ISD provides granular, quality-controlled data.
3. ASOS 1-Minute Data (via Iowa Environmental Mesonet)
Best for: Accident reconstruction, rapid wind shifts, peak gust timing
Coverage:U.S. ASOS airports (2000–present)
Resolution:1-minute intervals
Access:Iowa State IEM tools
Cost:Free
Legal Defensibility:HIGH (clear sensor provenance)
Why it matters for lawyers:
In cases requiring precise timing—such as when a structure collapsed or an accident occurred—1-minute data can pinpoint exact wind conditions during critical moments. This level of detail is invaluable for expert testimony and demonstrating causation.
4. Local Climatological Data (LCD)
Best for: Monthly summaries and extremes from major airports
Coverage:Major U.S. airports and prominent weather stations
Resolution:Monthly summaries (from hourly/daily obs)
Access:NCEI ordering tools
Cost:Free with ordering options available
Legal Defensibility:HIGH
Why it matters for lawyers:
LCD provides comprehensive station summaries including extreme wind events, making it useful for establishing patterns or demonstrating that conditions on a given date were unusual or severe.
Specialized Wind Data Sources
Offshore and Coastal Cases: NOAA National Data Buoy Center (NDBC)
If your case involves maritime incidents, coastal property damage, or offshore construction:
Coverage:Coastal and offshore buoys and C-MAN stations
Data:Wind speed/direction, waves, pressure
Access:Station-specific historical files
Cost:Free
Legal Defensibility:HIGH
How to use it:
Visit the NDBC website, locate the nearest buoy or coastal station to your incident location, and download historical data files. Data is typically available through the last complete calendar year.
Severe Weather Verification: NWS Storm Events Database
Best for: Confirming documented wind events and damage reports
Coverage:United States (January 1950–present)
Access:Web interface and bulk download
Cost:Free
Legal Defensibility:MEDIUM
Why it matters for lawyers:
While not a calibrated measurement source, Storm Events provides official National Weather Service documentation of reported severe wind events, including narratives of damage and impacts. This can corroborate your client’s claims or establish that weather conditions were officially recognized as severe.
Important limitation: Absence of a storm event entry does not prove winds were calm—many damaging wind events go unreported, especially in rural areas.
Radar Analysis: NEXRAD Level II Archive
Best for: Severe thunderstorm context, microbursts, wind shear analysis
Coverage:U.S. radar network (June 1991–present)
Access:NCEI inventory and cloud mirrors
Cost:Free
Legal Defensibility:MEDIUM
Why it matters for lawyers:
When working with meteorological experts to reconstruct severe thunderstorm wind events, NEXRAD data can reveal storm structure, intensity, and movement patterns. This is particularly valuable in tornado, downburst, and severe straight-line wind cases.
Regional Networks: State Mesonets
Best for: Filling gaps where airport stations are too distant
Coverage:State or regional networks (often 1990s–present)
Resolution:Often 5-minute observations
Cost:Usually free
Legal Defensibility:MEDIUM to HIGH (network-dependent)
Why it matters for lawyers:
Airport weather stations can be miles from your incident location. State mesonet stations (such as Oklahoma Mesonet, West Texas Mesonet, etc.) provide denser coverage and may offer more representative wind data for rural locations.
When Ground Stations Are Unavailable: Reanalysis Data
For locations without nearby weather stations, reanalysis products provide modeled atmospheric conditions based on global observations and physics-based models.
ERA5 Reanalysis (Copernicus/ECMWF)
Coverage:Global (1940–present)
Resolution:Hourly, approximately 31 km grid
Access:Copernicus Climate Data Store (free with account)
Legal Defensibility:MEDIUM
Why it matters for lawyers:
ERA5 can provide wind estimates for any location on Earth, including remote areas without observation stations. While not direct measurements, these are scientifically robust estimates used widely in research and engineering.
NASA MERRA-2 and NARR
Similar reanalysis products covering different time periods and regions. These are best deployed when:
- No direct observations exist near your location
- You need to establish broader meteorological context
- Your expert witness requires gridded data for modeling or analysis
Expert testimony note: When relying on reanalysis data, be prepared to qualify an expert meteorologist or atmospheric scientist to explain the methodology, validation, and appropriate use of these products.
Canadian and International Cases
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)
Coverage:Canadian weather stations
Resolution:Hourly, daily, and monthly
Access:Free web search and download
Legal Defensibility:HIGH
For Canada-based incidents, ECCC Historical Climate Data is the official government source and carries similar weight to NOAA data in the United States.
UK Met Office MIDAS Open
Coverage:United Kingdom (1853–present)
Access:CEDA catalogue (free registration)
Legal Defensibility:HIGH
For UK legal matters, MIDAS provides the authoritative historical weather record.
Step-by-Step: Obtaining Wind Data for Your Case
- Identify the Incident Location and Time
- Precise address or coordinates
- Date and time of incident (include timezone)
- Duration of relevant weather period
- Locate Nearby Weather Stations
- Use NCEI Climate Data Online station search
- Identify distance from incident to station
- Verify station was operational during your time period
- Determine Required Data Resolution
- Daily data:Sufficient for general conditions or climatological context
- Hourly data:Standard for most incidents requiring specific timing
- 1-minute data:Critical for accidents requiring precise chronology
- Request or Download Data
- For standard requests: Download directly from NCEI or relevant portal
- For certified records: Submit formal request through NCEI’s ordering system
- Document your data source, station ID, and download date for chain of custody
- Consider Expert ConsultationFor complex cases, consult a forensic meteorologist or atmospheric scientist who can:
- Validate data quality and representativeness
- Interpret weather observations in the context of local terrain
- Provide expert opinions on causation
- Testify regarding weather conditions and their impacts
Best Practices for Legal Documentation
1. Preserve metadata
Always retain station information, elevation, instrument type, and quality flags
2. Document your methodology
Record which sources you searched, what you found, and why you selected specific data
3. Obtain certified copies when available
For high-stakes litigation, certified records from NCEI carry additional evidentiary weight
4. Be transparent about limitations
If the nearest station is distant from your site, acknowledge this and consider supplemental sources
5. Maintain chain of custody
Document when and how you obtained the data
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Pitfall 1: Assuming the nearest airport represents your site
Wind is highly variable over short distances, especially in complex terrain. A station 10 miles away may have experienced significantly different conditions.
Pitfall 2: Relying on uncalibrated sources
Consumer weather stations and some apps provide data of unknown quality. Stick to authoritative sources for litigation.
Pitfall 3: Confusing sustained winds with gusts
Weather reports distinguish between sustained wind speed (typically averaged over 2 minutes) and peak gusts. Clarify which measurement is relevant to your case.
Pitfall 4: Ignoring data gaps
Stations occasionally go offline. Missing data during your critical time period could undermine your case—identify gaps early.
Pitfall 5: Overlooking temporal resolution
Daily average wind speed may obscure a brief but intense wind event. Match your data resolution to the temporal precision required.
Working with Weather Experts
In complex cases, consider retaining a qualified meteorologist who can:
- Conduct site-specific analysis accounting for local topography
- Interpret raw data in the context of atmospheric science
- Provide credible expert testimony
- Respond to opposing experts’ analyses
Certified Consulting Meteorologists (CCM) and board-certified forensic meteorologists specialize in litigation support and are accustomed to courtroom testimony.
Conclusion
Historical wind data is a powerful evidentiary tool when properly obtained and presented. By understanding the hierarchy of data defensibility, knowing where to find authoritative records, and following best practices for documentation, legal professionals can build stronger cases in weather-related litigation.
Start with high-defensibility government sources like NOAA NCEI, obtain certified records when stakes are high, match data resolution to your case requirements, and don’t hesitate to engage expert consultation for complex meteorological analysis.
The difference between winning and losing a weather-related case often comes down to the quality and credibility of the data you present. Invest the time to get it right.
Quick Reference: Top Sources by Use Case
| Your Situation | Recommended Source | Data Type |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. property damage claim | NCEI Climate Data Online (CDO) | Hourly/daily certified records |
| Accident requiring precise timing | ASOS 1-minute (via IEM) | 1-minute wind observations |
| Offshore maritime incident | NOAA NDBC | Buoy/coastal platform data |
| Severe thunderstorm verification | NWS Storm Events + NEXRAD | Event reports + radar |
| Remote location without nearby station | ERA5 Reanalysis | Gridded hourly estimates |
| Canadian incident | Environment Canada ECCC | Hourly/daily station data |
| UK incident | Met Office MIDAS Open | Hourly/daily station data |
About the Author
John Bryant
Professional Summary
Federal Court-Qualified Meteorologist | 30+ Years Meteorological Experience | Next-Day Settlement Results
John Bryant has secured millions in settlements through forensic weather analysis for plaintiff and defense clients, including a wrongful death flooding case that settled the next day at mediation. With federal court-accepted reports and over a dozen years as a Chief Meteorologist, John delivers courtroom-ready evidence that wins cases on either side of the litigation.
Certified by the Gold Standard American Meteorological Society and the National Weather Association, John has provided deposition testimony and prepared forensic meteorological reports accepted in federal court, demonstrating the highest scientific rigor and legal acceptance. His forensic methodology combines historical weather database analysis, radar interpretation, and atmospheric modeling to reconstruct precise conditions at specific times and locations.
Focus Areas
Severe Weather Event and Wind Damage Assessments (wind, tornado, hurricane, hail, flood, lightning)
Slip and Fall Injury Investigations (snow, ice, surface conditions)
Motor Vehicle Accident Weather Causation (black ice, rain, fog, roadway visibility)
WWW.WEATHERANDCLIMATEEXPERT.COM
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with qualified meteorological experts and legal counsel for case-specific guidance.
© 2025 John Bryant. All rights reserved.